Here's a letter sent to Frontpageafrica regarding "...Gyude Bryant Sets the Record Straight":
The Editor,
Gyude Bryant brags "that after 135 days of trial, the jury unanimously acquitted me and others (Snowe and Devine) of all charges), but does that mean that Bryant isn't an old rogue??? Please!! (Re "...... Gyude Bryant Sets Record Straight")
In most criminal cases, the prosecution (government) bears the burden of proof and is required to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and in some cases, they (prosecution) may be unable to do so for a variety of reason (s).
But the rest of us can discuss the evidence (things that we know and see with our own two eyes like Bryant's Hairy Bank accounts, Snowe's sunroof house and Devine's designer shades) and have opinions about the case, regardless of the jury's verdict. To paraphrase Groucho Marx "Who are you going to believe, (the jury) or your own two eyes???"
Look: The only regret I have about Gyude Bryant theft case is, after the jury acquitted Bryant, Snowe and Devine of stealing, we didn't get to look in back pockets of those sleazebags (judge and the jury) sitting on the bench!
Bryant proclaiming his innocence after stealing LPRC funds reminds me of O.J Simpson proclaiming his innocence after murdering Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman!