Monday March 15, 2010
Login | About | Advertise | Archives | Subscribe | Contact | Help/FAQ    

Archive

March 15th, 2010

martyretire's picture

When the Time Comes to Concede Defeat, Will Weah Be Ready???

Here's letter sent to the Daily Observer in response to George Weah's letter "CDC Will Make the Difference"

Mr. Editor,

Mr. Weah writes as if it's a foregone conclusion that he, George Weah would be CDC (Congress for Democratic Change) Standard bearer in the 2011 Presidential elections. (Re "CDC Will Make the Difference")

But one shudders to think what would happen if Weah won his party elections (as standard bearer) but lost in the national elections (the presidency) again. In other words, when the time comes to concede defeat, will Weah be ready??

We all remember how, after losing the elections in 2005, the then CDC Standard bearer, Mr. George Weah continued to bitch about the elections results: He made angry calls for recount;
he made seditious speeches at political rallies and he threaten legal challenges while he continued to suffer from an inadequate vote tally!

Hopefully, when that time comes around again in 2011 (for Weah to concede defeat), someone will provide Weah with some CDC-CIALIS to help him deal with his electile dysfunction!

Our country don't need to deal with Weah acting like a nut in 2011.

Martin Scott
Atlanta, Georgia

martyretire's picture

Gyude Bryant "new" Book (co-authored by Snowe & Devine): "If We Stole US$1 Million From LPRC, Here's How It Happened"

Here's a letter sent to Frontpageafrica regarding "...Gyude Bryant Sets the Record Straight":

The Editor,

Gyude Bryant brags "that after 135 days of trial, the jury unanimously acquitted me and others (Snowe and Devine) of all charges), but does that mean that Bryant isn't an old rogue??? Please!! (Re "...... Gyude Bryant Sets Record Straight")

In most criminal cases, the prosecution (government) bears the burden of proof and is required to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and in some cases, they (prosecution) may be unable to do so for a variety of reason (s).

But the rest of us can discuss the evidence (things that we know and see with our own two eyes like Bryant's Hairy Bank accounts, Snowe's sunroof house and Devine's designer shades) and have opinions about the case, regardless of the jury's verdict. To paraphrase Groucho Marx "Who are you going to believe, (the jury) or your own two eyes???"

Look: The only regret I have about Gyude Bryant theft case is, after the jury acquitted Bryant, Snowe and Devine of stealing, we didn't get to look in back pockets of those sleazebags (judge and the jury) sitting on the bench!

Bryant proclaiming his innocence after stealing LPRC funds reminds me of O.J Simpson proclaiming his innocence after murdering Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman!

March 13th